gyptazy

@gyptazy@gyptazy.ch

Believer in the power of open-source & community-driven innovation.

Former AS20621 NetOp that loves FreeBSD & illumos. Currently mostly in DevOps & developing (Python, Rust). Contributes to & . Evaluating and production usage of hardware/software.

Projects:
* BoxyBSD.com - A free VM hosting service to provide some value back to the community.
* manpageblog.org - A static blog generator in manpage design.
* QualvoSec - A security patch management tool.
Blog: ✔ https://gyptazy.ch
GitHub: ✔ https://github.com/gyptazy
X: https://twitter.com/gyptazy
0 ★ 0 ↺
in reply to »

gyptazy »
@gyptazy@gyptazy.ch

@zirias@techhub.social According to https://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsOnTier2Architectures you're probably right. According to https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/committers-guide/#archs I'd probably expect at least the "basic tools" where it says "The ports infrastructure should include basic support for Tier 2 architectures sufficient to support building ports and packages. This includes support for basic packages such as ports-mgmt/pkg".

However, I took the ports tarball from GitHub and building, now.

History

about this site - powered by snac