gyptazy

@gyptazy@gyptazy.ch

Believer in the power of open-source & community-driven innovation.

Former AS20621 NetOp that loves FreeBSD & illumos. Currently mostly in DevOps & developing (Python, Rust). Contributes to & . Evaluating and production usage of hardware/software.

Projects:
* BoxyBSD.com - A free VM hosting service to provide some value back to the community.
* manpageblog.org - A static blog generator in manpage design.
* QualvoSec - A security patch management tool.
Bloghttps://gyptazy.ch
GitHubhttps://github.com/gyptazy
Xhttps://twitter.com/gyptazy
0 ★ 0 ↺
in reply to »

gyptazy »
@gyptazy@gyptazy.ch

So, I'm closing this test for today and I'm honestly very happy how the board performs in the wild.

Attached you can find the metrics and the system wasn't bothered in any way... But I also need to say, that everything is running in a very optimized way with a really low footprint in all ways. Thank you all (it were more than 20 people over the whole day) for testing, stress testing and your feedback I got during the day. The next steps will result in replacing ns[01,02] and ntp[01,02] (low performance) with ( boards. ns[03,04] and ntp[03,04] will remain on ARM architecture until everything is running stable. Guess, you will see some more RISC64 related content soon - stay tuned!

History